Know where the project
actually is.
Schedule, progress, procurement, and claims move into one model — the record assembles itself.
Drift visible. Blockers named.
The control surface shows programme drift and current blockers — each with the responsible party named. The weekly digest writes itself from the project's data.
Control surface — drift, blockers, and the weekly digest
Headline drift against baseline, with every blocker attributed to a party.
2880 × 1800
The fragmentation
is the risk.
Schedule in one tool, progress in WhatsApp, procurement in Excel, claims in folders — the information that matters most sits in systems that do not connect. One model replaces the gaps.
- Schedule in a legacy scheduler The programme
- Progress in WhatsApp Field updates, reviewed
- Procurement in Excel Procurement chains in the logic
- Obligations in email and memory Clocks with a responsible party
- Claims evidence in folders The chronology
The dispute record,
already assembled.
Every delay event carries its timestamp, cause, responsible party, and evidence. The chronology exists before anyone asks for it — not reconstructed months later from scattered files.
One system, not a stack
A legacy scheduler like Primavera P6 plus reporting tools plus analysis tools plus months of manual delay reconstruction. Humigo replaces the stack — schedule, progress, obligations, and evidence in one system.
Portfolio view — projects, drift, and exposure
Every project in the portfolio, with its drift and open obligations.
2880 × 1800
Import, run in parallel,
commit to nothing.
- 01
Import
Bring your current programme as an XER or MSPDI file, with its history intact.
- 02
Parallel run
Run Humigo alongside your existing scheduler on a live project. Nothing contractual moves.
- 03
Decide
If the system does not earn the switch, you leave with your data.